User talk:Tm

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

---

Archives 12-06-2007/13-07-2009 13-07-2009/23-12-2010/ 23-12-2011/31-12-2012/ 05-12-2013/31-12-2013/ 27-01-2014/26-12-2014/ 01-01-2015/29-12-2015/ 10-01-2016/28-12-2016/ 04-01-2017/31-12-2017/ 04-01-2018/31-12-2018/ 07-01-2019/31-12-2019/ Current

Over-categorization

Please don't add files that are already properly categorized to more general categories. Avoid COM:OVERCAT. --Zinnsoldat (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Categorization of images to Santa Maria (Azores)

In reference to your categorization of several photos (49) by Michael Gaylard to Category:Santa Maria (Azores), please note that this is incorrect. The images referred do not show any aspect of the island (location or content), but rather depict events, actions or imagery from the island of Madeira. Further, Mr. Gaylard has named his files for the ship/caravel/cruise depicted in his original Flicker account. I kindly request that those images remain associated with the location (Madeira) or be classified/categorized accordingly with the ship or other aspects of the imagery. One thing is clear: these images are not associated with the island of Santa Maria in the Azores, as you insist.^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Range block?

Hello,

It seems that we have to calm down an incompetent user(*). How can a range block be demanded? Our over-/mis-categorizer is there: Special:Contributions/2408:8215:1C01:751:84F3:23B8:748:17D0/32.

(*) I'm also rather incompetent but I listen to others' remarks.

--Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Vintage Star Wars LED Watches by Texas Instruments, Dated 1977 (8322270748).jpg

File:Vintage Star Wars LED Watches by Texas Instruments, Dated 1977 (8322270748).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Vintage Star Wars Red LED Watch By Texas Instruments, Copyright 1977 (15416565144).jpg

File:Vintage Star Wars Red LED Watch By Texas Instruments, Copyright 1977 (15416565144).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Ravenhill Stadium

Is there any plausible reason for this revert (and I mean 'plausible')? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Is there any plausible reason for reshape an image in 3:2 aspect ratio over the original upload (and I mean 'plausible')? Tm (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes. 3:2 is the normal photo aspect ratio and grass is not relevant. Thanks for not providing any good reason. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

22 January 2020 (UTC)

No. Again no 'plausible' reason given to upload a new version over an original one just because you think that all images have to have one aspect ration. Thanks for not providing any good reason. Tm (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization

Hi Tm, @Estopedist1: removed Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization from Category:To be checked. I, as a consequence removed the images from Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, as all the images are in Category:Photographs by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization anyhow. And to get them into Category:Uncategorized to enforce proper categorization where missing. Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization needs further categorization into subcategories (it is too crowded) and categorization by persons, events and location. It does not help to undo this. It would help if you could further categorize some of the images. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Fertagus (39997743382).ogv

File:Fertagus (39997743382).ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

File:AIRPOWER16 - Air to Air SK35C Draken (29321174321).jpg

File:AIRPOWER16 - Air to Air SK35C Draken (29321174321).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D-Kuru (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Malmö Pride 2017 (36401578456).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Motociclistas na Praça do Marquês de Pombal (29783040177).webm

File:Motociclistas na Praça do Marquês de Pombal (29783040177).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:From Court 17 to Court Suzanne Lenglen (47524999251).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:From Court 17 to Court Suzanne Lenglen (47524999251).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:Court 7 (40529445153).jpg

Regards, Jonteemil (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:Aston Martin DB7 6.3 '95 (8911084394).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DB9 6.0 '10 (11782615184).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DBS (27445122464).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DBS 4.0 '70 (8509053403).jpg
• File:Vantage GT4 (17314014460).jpg
• File:Aston Martin. (4263193391).jpg

Some might be COM:De minimis but I don't know. If you think some are, remove the DW-template and I'll start a normal DR so people that know more than me can decide.

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg

And also:

• File:Aston Martin DB7 6.3 '95 (8911084394).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DB9 6.0 '10 (11782615184).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DBS (27445122464).jpg
• File:Aston Martin DBS 4.0 '70 (8509053403).jpg
• File:Aston Martin. (4263193391).jpg
• File:Vantage GT3 (16881547033).jpg
• File:Vantage GT4 (17314014460).jpg

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 15:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nude_portrayals_of_Fruit_Ninja

Nude portrayals of Fruit Ninja has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/03/Category:Nude_portrayals_of_Fruit_Ninja. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Carlinmack (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

File:2019 - Best of Attendees DF2 7234 (49006086217).jpg

File:2019 - Best of Attendees DF2 7234 (49006086217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 06:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Clearing the cache

Hi. When you redirected Category:Musical instrument museums in Portugal to Category:Music museums in Portugal the redirected category is still showing as an empty cat in the target category. One way to solve this quickly is a null edit. Open the redirected page, go to the very end and delete the automatic empty space. Save the category (any summary you wish) and it won’t actually save it but it removes the redirected category from the target category. I hope that’s useful. 193.62.152.193 11:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Model Rosie on a bed - In Black and White (14192377223).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Model Rosie on a bed - In Black and White (14192377223).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Stoya_in_2014

Stoya in 2014 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/03/Category:Stoya_in_2014. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nikki_Benz_in_2012

Nikki Benz in 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/03/Category:Nikki_Benz_in_2012. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Amanda Beard on the Red Carpet (cropped).jpg

And also:

• File:Amanda Beard on the Red Carpet.jpg
• File:Amanda Bynes on the Red Carpet (cropped).jpg
• File:Amanda Bynes on the Red Carpet.jpg
• File:Chaka Khan in Chris March 01.jpg
• File:Elisabeth Röhm in Nicole Miller 03.jpg
• File:Gloria Estefan in Narciso Rodriguez 01.jpg
• File:Jenna Elfman in Alberta Ferretti 01.jpg
• File:Linda Evans in Tadashi Shoji 02.jpg
• File:Linda Evans in Tadashi Shoji 03.jpg
• File:Rose McGowan in The Heart Truth 2012.jpg

Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)