User talk:SirEdimon
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- 23:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Nossa Senhora dos Remedios.jpg[edit]
 |
File:Nossa Senhora dos Remedios.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Old PiriPiri.jpg[edit]
|
File:Old PiriPiri.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg
- File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (
), or All Rights Reserved (
), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as 
(CC BY), 
(CC BY-SA) or 
(CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. Following your message Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) is not suitable for Commons since commercial use must be permitted. The valid licenses are listed at COM:L. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Read COM:L.
- Patrick Rogel So the only "wrong" thing is the commercial use not being permitted?--SirEdimon (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes indeeed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel Oh, I see. What a pity. These images would be very useful. Thank you for your help and for you response.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes indeeed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel So the only "wrong" thing is the commercial use not being permitted?--SirEdimon (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Read COM:L.
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Elisfkc (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Elisfkc (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA) or (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted content[edit]
the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:
File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg
The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg
- File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 04:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Michael Gielen.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Michael Gielen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel My bad. I just saw the image on Flickr and as it was licensed as "some rights reserved" I thought I could use it here. I'm sorry for this mistake. You can nominate it for speedy deletion if you can or wish. Please accept my apologies.--SirEdimon (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Uwe Gensheimer at the 2019 World Men's Handball Championship.jpg[edit]
Hi SirEdimon, the Flickr-uploader/author of this image is on our "bad author" list, whereby we cannot accept uploads from them. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Cropping images[edit]
Hi, I noticed that you have cropped several images, presumably to remove a logo. There may be legal implications in doing this, see Commons:Watermarks#Legal issues with the removal of watermarks. This is not an official Commons policy or guideline and I'm not telling you to not do it, but you should be aware of the legal issues.
I also notice that the file size of your cropped images is much smaller than the originals, indicating that the image is more compressed and has probably lost some image quality. I recommend using Commons:CropTool. Rather than cropping, it is often better to paint out unwanted elements of an image using an image editor, retaining the original composition. I do this using Microsoft Paint to copy a neighbouring area of the image, as in File:Brynford Village Green - geograph.org.uk - 33781.jpg. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Martin Filler DM.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Martin Filler DM.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Martin Filler DM.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Secondarywaltz. This image was uploaded on en.WP, it's there for over 7 years and it was suggested by a bot to transfer it to Commons. If this is a COPYVIO, it's a serious COPYVIO on en.WP (where the image is being used for several years). If this is a COPYVIO just tell me and I'll nominate the image at en.WP for deletion too. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Secondarywaltz: Note attached to the upload states "Image copyright © Duane Michals" and there is no permission from the author. Secondarywaltz (talk)
- {{reply to|Yes, I noted it, but I assumed that it was "impossible" to an image to remain for over 7 years on Wikipedia violating copyright without anyone (admins/experienced editors) to notice it. Perhaps, I was a little bit "naive". I have no means to contact the image's author and the editor, who originally uploaded it on en.WP, is inactive for almost 6 years now. I guess the only solution is to delete it. I'm sorry for this mistake. I'll nominate the original image for deletion. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Secondarywaltz: Note attached to the upload states "Image copyright © Duane Michals" and there is no permission from the author. Secondarywaltz (talk)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
