User talk:Rodhullandemu

Archives Archive, Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4,

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spire of St Andrew's, West Kirby 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logos of Liverpool FC.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heaven and Earth, Liverpool by Andy Plant..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Artist's name is usually given for works of art. Charles (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - I don't think "by" should be capitalized. Don't scopes follow English grammar? Or perhaps I'm incorrect on their preferred format? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• I see nothing in the VI requirements to credit a work of art in the scope. It's actually there in the category which constitutes the scope. The typography is such a minor detail. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• No dispute that it's a minor detail, but it's nice to be elegant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• Agreed, but I strive to put the elegance into the photographs themselves. When I am faced with the unnecessary, elegance is optional, because I have other things to do. Cheers. 23:12, Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MOD Police launch Harris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The year a photo is taken is not appropriate for a VI scope. For a sensible scope, it would be better to specify the boat (Holyhead Marine 15m Police Patrol Boat). It's name can be addded, but it's not material where the boat is not unique. Charles (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't understand. The boat is usually in Scotland. It followed HMS Prince of Wales to Liverpool, where it was berthed for the last week. Other photographs of it elsewhere on a particular day or at a particular event would have their own scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment No, there would only be one scope. Location is not important here. Charles (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
      • Scope modified. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

• No problem with the scope, but please link to the gallery where the photo and any other photos of this police launch are. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support thanks Charles (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobacco Warehouse, Stanley Dock from the Mersey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexandra Tower, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallasey Town Hall from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If the Town Hall is only the building in the middle, then I feel a crop would be helpful. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done But I think it useful to keep the river and steps. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
    •  Support Yes, I agree. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 20:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallasey Dock impounding station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)