User talk:Kaldari

Archive

File:Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema, RA, OM - Portrait of a Sailor - Walters 372663.jpg

Hi Kaldari, I wonder about the french origin, mustnot it be from the netherlands. Greetings––Oursana (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Poster of flowers

Hi Kaldari,

I have just used one of your excellente pictures to make a poster of white flowers: File:White flowers b.jpg. It is one of the best in the bunch... Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Nashville picture for my homepage?

Hi Kaldari,

I wanted to verify (FAQ writes, that I should), that I can use your picture from Nashville

Nashville skyline 2009

for my homepage. Can I use it as a picture in the header? (It's about my country [and soul] music)

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards Josh T. Cute

Sure you can use it all you want. I would prefer to not be credited anywhere. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Thx again :) (I think, I'm commited to relate to the copyright holder under german law) Josh T. Cute

a heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Phidippus

check out : http://salticidae.org/salticid/diagnost/phidippu/cardi-ph.htm

I think the spider picture you identified as Phidippus johnsoni is actually P. cardinalis. Patrick Edwin Moran (talk) 04:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC) I think I was wrong, anyway. I'll find that picture again. I've raised a couple of P. johnsoni and I don't think the one of yours I was looking at looks right, but the one I found had the wrong carapace color. I'm blind, obviously. Patrick Edwin Moran (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Oddly I never noticed before. All the P. johnsoni that I have seen have lacked the spots, but Edwards says that most specimens have the spots. My mistake.Patrick Edwin Moran (talk) 12:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Curious about your take on this

Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed

You know much more about this area than I do. Let me know if you have any insights? -Pete F (talk) 01:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Chimp Brain in a jar.jpg

File:Chimp Brain in a jar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

193.62.111.10 13:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Not "Deleted per Turelio" but "Kept per Turelio". Stupid mistake. --High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grand Theft Auto logo series.svg

The U.S. laws do not apply on Commons but it's international. If in wikipédia French is prohibited so it's prohibited in Commons in general, because is more restrictive. Sorry for my english, the origin of law or copy right isn't an argument. 85.68.6.93 08:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Dear Kaldari,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

—

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Kaldari, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Kaldari, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thanks for the holiday greets!

Nice to hear from you -- and yes, let's be sure to do some offline beveraging soon! ..this weekend perhaps? -Pete F (talk) 04:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Dealing with the URAA

Hi, I see from your posts at Commons talk:URAA-restored copyrights that you are interested in tackling the problems that the URAA causes us here on Commons. I've started a new policy that might help, at Commons:Hosting of content released to the public domain globally. Could you have a look, and also add your thoughts to the talk page? I hope you will support it! --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Maryland Decriminalization

Kaldari, would you be willing to update the US cannabis laws map since I can't seem to figure that out?

Map updated. Kaldari (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for your edits! I am still learning on here, but would like to change the color of Maryland for the update. Can you assist? Dialectic2012 (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

hockey photos from Flickr

Hi! I uploaded a series of hockey photos from Flickr, but a bot seems to be unable to find them in the gallery :(. If you could approve them, I would be most grateful.

• File:Xan de Waard.jpg
• File:Xan de Waard (2).jpg
• File:The Crowd at Kyocera Stadium, The Hague.jpg
• File:Carlien Dirkse van den Heuvel.jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup - Netherlands team - Maartje Paumen.jpg
• File:Dutch team huddle.jpg
• File:Maartje Paumen (2).jpg
• File:Maartje Paumen (3).jpg
• File:Kim Lammers (2).jpg
• File:Xan de Waard (cropped).jpg
• File:Maartje Paumen (1).jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup (1).jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup (4).jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup (5).jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup - Argentina.jpg
• File:2014 Hockey World Cup (6).jpg

Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

@Hawkeye7: The problem is that the file pages don't link directly to the images on Flickr, just to the photoset. If you change the links on the file pages, the bot should be able to approve all of them. Kaldari (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Attribution for image

Dear Sir,

I would like to use your image of the "Twin-spotted Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus magister) in Phoenix, Arizona" available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASceloporus_magister_Phoenix.jpg , in an extension-outreach publication related to pests in community environments. This publication is purely for educational purposes and has no commercial interests whatsoever.

However, the suggested attribution format, "By Kaldari (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons", is very different from the style I will be following for other pictures in my publication, which will most likely be much shorter and in the format:

"Photo by Abc Defghijk", or "Photo by Abc Defghijk, Lmnopqr.org".

Therefore for the sake of consistency, kindly let me know whether I may cite the images in the above formats, and if so, what name/affiliation should I use.

Thank you! Sincerely, Shaku

Shaku Nair, Ph.D. Assistant in Extension, Community IPM University of Arizona - Maricopa Ag. Center 37860 W. Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, AZ 85138-3010 Cell: (520) 840-9429 Office: (520) 374-6299

Help

I ask you to move the names of these file and delete repeated words (file) and (jpg):

1. File:File1917 378 Guglielmo e lo Zar.jpg.jpg‎;
2. File:File1917 921a Alpini.jpg.jpg‎;
3. File:File1917 921a Alpini.jpg.jpg‎;Omar35880 (talk) 03:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@Omar35880: Done. Kaldari (talk) 03:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

ThanksOmar35880 (talk) 11:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Re bugzilla:71897

Hi. I saw that you enabled wgCopyUploadsFromSpecialUpload at testwiki and later removed.. Is it okay to enable it here at commons? (i.e., Do you know whether any nasty things happen when it's enabled?). Regards, --Glaisher (talk) 04:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

@Glaisher: Replied in the bug. Kaldari (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dante Gabriel Rossetti - Joan of Arc (1882).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dante Gabriel Rossetti - Joan of Arc (1882).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Spinne Bratental Ps.jpg

Can you identify this to a lower level, please? Jee 06:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

At de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung#Bild_aus_WLE:_Geht_es_genauer_als_.22Krabbenspinne.22.3F, it is already suggested as Misumena cf. vatia. Jee 06:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Looking for connections to the Honolulu Museum of Art

Aloha! I am guessing that you know someone from the Honolulu Museum of Art or an editor who works with them, from the bot that you ran that uploaded images from HMA. I used to live on Oahu, & someone from the Smithsonian asked me if I know of any Wikipedia or Wikimedia contacts in Honolulu. I am including below what I have been posting on the talk pages of Wikipedians in Hawaii. Peaceray (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Looking for editors to help with an Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon in Honolulu

On Oahu? Edit Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects? You are invited to help the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center with an Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon in Honolulu this September.

Aloha!

Last summer I moved to the Seattle area after 14 years in Kailua on Oahu. I immediately fell in with the Cascadia Wikimedians User Group as it formed, joined its board and became its first president as well as the GLAM representative for Washington State.

Recently, Adriel Luis, Curator (Digital & Emerging Media) at the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center, contacted me about setting up an edit-a-thon like the previous Wikipedia APA edit-a-thon. In addition to discussing one for Seattle, he wrote:

"It's awesome to learn about your past in Honolulu - I'm actually going to be there for another SmithsonianAPA project mid September, and thinking that this could be an opportunity to do an event there as well! I have lots of contacts with UH and the museums, but do you know of any contacts on the Wikimedia side out there?"

As I was working two jobs while I lived on Oahu, I did not have the opportunity to meet your or any other Wikipedians at the time. Hence, the reason why I am contacting you now.

If you would like to help, please contact me through one of these methods:

• Email me directly at peaceray@cascadia.wiki
• Use Special:EmailUser/Peaceray to email me
• Leave a message for me on my talk page.

Mahalo,
Peaceray

De-adminship warning

Dear Kaldari, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:New york restaurant by edward hopper.jpg

File:New york restaurant by edward hopper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.42.234.26 07:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Jim Morrison

There were some very detailed arguments presented at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg, but you did not offer any explanation as to why you believed those arguments were valid or invalid. Carl presented 3 different US court cases showing that, according to US jurisprudence, derivative copyright protects only the new material contained in the derivative work, not the matter derived from the underlying work. Do you disagree with that assessment? If so, could you explain why? Kaldari (talk) 05:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Also, you should be aware that Joel Brodsky's estate is actively claiming copyright over this image: http://www.tmetta.com/brodsky.html, thus keeping this image on Commons may be putting the uploader and reusers at legal and financial risk. Kaldari (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Having accepted your appeal, next time, please avoid moving a file to be deleted soon, and avoid editing your post to my talk page too frequently in a short time. I had problems reading your post and deleting your questioned file.--Jusjih (talk) 19:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. Kaldari (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I could claim copyright over an image of Jimi Hendrix. Doesn't make me the actual copyright holder. How exactly could they own a photograph copyrighted to 2006 when Jim Morrison actually died in 1971? Even if Brodsky took the photograph in the 1960s or whenever it was, proof was presented at the IFD that there was no registration for the photo for either Brodsky or Elektra Records. Of course Brodsky is going to claim copyright on it as it's probably a good source of income. It's a bullshit argument.Dr. Blofeld (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• I agree. A copyright claim on a public domain work is clearly invalid. Unless there's something that multiple editors missed during the two deletion reviews (a registration or renewal), I don't see how the claim can hold water. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
• A supposed 2006 copyright claim of someone who died in 1971? Something is obviously screwy with that, and with yet another deletion on dubious grounds. - SchroCat (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

As has been explained several times, no copyright registration was necessary since the photo was first published after 1963. If anyone can provide an example of this photograph (not a derivative work) being published without a copyright notice before 1978 (as the license tag claimed), I'll be very happy to undelete it myself. As it stands, there is simply no evidence that this photograph is public domain, but there is evidence that someone is actively claiming copyright over it (even if the year is bogus). Kaldari (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Move

Dear Kaldari, would you help to move the file File:File70. UN Generalversammlung (21797538816) Mohammed al-Dairi.jpg to File:70. UN Generalversammlung (21797538816) Mohammed al-Dairi.jpg Maher27777 (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

for taking action! Could you also take care about this same issue? --.js (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivity

Hello! Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 4 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Gulfstream Park's giant sculpture - Pegasus slaying a dragon.jpg

I came across this image today which you uploaded. Problem; I believe it's copyrighted. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for three dimensional works of art. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. The statue was recently constructed, and thus automatically enjoys copyright protections whether so labeled, registered, or not. Given that its license is incompatible with Commons and being that you're an admin, would you be so kind as to delete the image? Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: Sadly, I think you're right. I'll delete it. Kaldari (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Mexico - 50 centavos - 1994.jpg

File:Mexico - 50 centavos - 1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Godot13 (talk) 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your feedback is needed

Could you please tell us your opinion regarding this discussion? Thanks. --Mhhossein ^talk 18:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Carl Reiner photo

File:Carl Reiner 1960 still.jpg had been discussed at the Village Pump before uploading. --Light show (talk) 04:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

@Light show: The license you put on the image said it was published "without a copyright notice", which was clearly not true. I'll undelete the image, but please be sure to put the correct license tag on images in the future and link to any discussions about them. Kaldari (talk) 04:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I know you are a good contributor but...

... what's going on with this edit? It looks like you deleted a bunch of other people's comments. I'll try to piece it all back together but figured you should know you did this. - Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jmabel: Thanks. Not sure what happened there. I must have accidentally been editing from an older revision. Kaldari (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

That makes sense, but only if you were editing the whole page rather than a section... - Jmabel ! talk 04:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Ionized Carbon Atoms in Orion (PIA21073).jpg

File:Ionized Carbon Atoms in Orion (PIA21073).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Fabian RRRR (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Spider taxonomy

Estoy poniendo las referencias que puedo encontrar en estos momentos, al haber una gran discusión sobre la taxonomía de estos géneros, en muchos de ellos debo incluir taxoconflict, hasta que referencias más fiables aclaren las dudas. Si tiene alguna fuente fiable, le ruego me lo indique para poder realizar mis ediciones con más fiabilidad. Si me he embarcado en actualizar las arañas, es porque el 95% de los géneros se encontraban sin taxon. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 09:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.png

Yours sincerely, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Kaldari,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nephilidae demotion

I've been making fixes on the English Wikipedia for the demotion of the spider family Nephilidae to the subfamily Nephilinae, implicitly accepted by the World Spider Catalog since the genera now appear in Araneidae. Here, I created Category:Nephilinae and re-categorized appropriately, leaving a category redirect at Category:Nephilidae. I hope that was the right thing to do. There are two other categories that need fixing: Category:Videos of Nephilidae and Category:Unidentified Nephilidae, which I'm not sure how to handle. Can you please check what I've done and deal with anything else? I'm far from experienced in Commons editing. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Horse (5951747975).jpg

Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Horse (5951747975).jpg

Thanks again for your support of yesterday Moyanbrenn (talk) 09:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Translations

Português: Página do name (D2.2 1) Fundo Placide Vigneau.

Español: Página de name (D2.2 1) Fundo Placide Vigneau.

Esperanto: Paĝo de name (D2.2 1) Fondo Placide Vigneau.

abuse filter syntax question

Quick question. Is there the ability to combine contains_any and regex. I am more interested in managing case sensitivity for file extensions. Thanks for any help and my inability to work it out myself.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: I don't believe there's any way to combine contains_any and regex, but I also can't think of any situations where you would use contains_any that couldn't be handled by a regex instead. What specific problem are you trying to solve? Kaldari (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

At enWS we have a problematic person uploading video files. Started as only webm, though starting to spread their wings. For many users unfamiliar with regex, I find "contains_any" easiest for admins to understand and to which to add. So maybe I will try this contains_any(lcase(article_text), ".webm", ".flac", ".ogg")  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shoemaker 1821.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shoemaker 1821.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

??

Why are people now able to upload mp3? If it is now a right, can I get it? I plan on uploading a few pre-1923 songs. Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Extended uploaders

Hi Kaldari, Over at Commons:Extended uploaders it said "'''Extended uploaders''' is a special [[<tvar|mw1>:mw:Special:MyLangauge/Help:User rights and groups</>|user group]] for registered Commons users",
However when I clicked on "user group" it took me to a MW page however it says "No such special page" so I removed the "Special:MyLangauge/" part however I'm not sure if this was the correct thing to do so figured I'd leave a message incase you might understand it all and can perhaps fix it,
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

@Davey2010: Looks like Steinsplitter fixed it :) Kaldari (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hey Davey2010, the 'a' And 'u' in language was switched. Artix Kreiger (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Was just about to update this but yeah I didn't spot the typo there I just assumed it was an error with that template thingy, Ah well thanks both :), –Davey2010^Talk 21:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Data USA

Hi Kaldari,

I will rename some of the files there. The state initials should be capitalized. Artix Kreiger (talk) 04:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Chelonoidis_nigra_abingdoni

Chelonoidis nigra abingdoni has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/03/Category:Chelonoidis_nigra_abingdoni. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kersti (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Request to revise map for Cannabis laws

Hi Kaldari, the article for world cannabis laws has included a map . The colour for norway is wrong, as they have decriminalised all drugs as of December 2017.
I don't think I have the correct permissions to edit it myself as my Wikipedia account is only a couple hours old, so I am asking if you could change the colour of Norway to orange (illegal, decriminalised).
I will include two links, first the one to the Commons site where the particular map file is (the one I'd like you to change), and another one where I have changed the colour of Norway correctly.
(1) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-cannabis-laws.png
(2) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-cannabis-laws-revised.png
-mxastrup, 07.07.18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxastrup (talk • contribs) 03:47, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kaldari,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Walters Museum

Ryan, You did the upload of Walters Museum files. I wonder if you still have the metadata laying around somewhere so we could move that data to Wikidata. It looks like very few artworks from Walters Museum are on Wikidata. Alternative approach would be to reach out to User:Dylan k who seem to be still at Walters Museum, to get fresh copy of the data. Any thoughts? --Jarekt (talk) 14:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Jarekt, I'm willing to help with a fresh copy of the data, and may also have the original metadata laying around. How can I help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylan k (talk • contribs) 18:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jarekt: I looked through my files, but I don't seem to have a copy of the original metadata. Kaldari (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

pst - http://api.thewalters.org/ ? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Whistlers Mother, James Abbott McNeill Whistler cropped.jpg

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

templatedata

He Kaldari, i'm just wondering about the changes on {{Information}} regarding templatedata you made. What triggered this, and what specifically was 'a mess' ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@TheDJ: The main problems were super long parameter descriptions, WikiText in the descriptions (which ends up being output as escaped HTML), no examples, and no format specified. Of these, all of them could have been fixed within TemplateBox except for the missing format. Rather than messing with the TemplateBox mess, I though it would be easier and clearer to just separate the TemplateData out. Plus that was the only way to specify the format, which needed to be set to 'block' (since otherwise the template defaulted to inline). I think Rillke started working on adding format support to Module:TemplateBox, but it hasn't been added yet. I'm fine with switching back to TemplateBox once that is done if people think it makes more sense. Kaldari (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Oh and the thing that triggered me changing it was seeing the following description of the "author" parameter in the TemplateWizard interface:

Original author of the file; where appropriate, use {{Creator:Name Surname}}. If the work is derived from or depicts works by someone other than the author, the author of the original work should also be mentioned. For example, for a photograph of a sculpture, make a mention of both the sculptor and the photographer. For vectorizing works, use the template {| | style="padding:0 4px;background-color:#CCF;width:12%" | Original: | style="width:38%" | <span lang="en">Unknown</span> | style="padding:0 4px;background-color:#CCF;width:12%" | Vector: | style="width:38%" | [[:User:test|test]] |}. If the author has submitted an OTRS ticket but prefers not to disclose his/her name, enter the word "Confidential". This field should ''not'' be used to specify the name of the person who is the scanner, finder, or uploader of the image; these things do not make them the author.

I changed it to just: "Original author of the file; where appropriate, use {{Creator:Name Surname}}." Kaldari (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

ping @Multichill: —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@TheDJ: I just added format support to Module:TemplateBox, which seems to be working. TemplateBox still doesn't seem to support "suggested" as a general parameter status though. Maybe someone could investigate that. Basically, no one has updated the TemplateBox module in 5 years, so it's just outdated. Kaldari (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

LOC ?

Hello,

Could you tell me what LOC means in this context?

Br,

--AntonierCH ^(d) 22:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

@AntonierCH: Sorry, it means Library of Congress. Kaldari (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 18:28, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in Stockholm

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

thanks and question

Hello there, I saw you uploaded File:Wikitongues Jerry speaking Cherokee.mp3. Thank you. I've placed that file and the video of en:w:Jeremiah Wolfe on his Wikipedia article. I found them both at Category:Cherokee language. I was wondering about getting an audio file for en:w:Myrtle Driver Johnson. I quote her from this creative commons YouTube video. She speaks starting at 21'18" and ends at 21'43". How would one go about getting that audio uploaded to commons? Many thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Or video. Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

@Biosthmors: That video doesn't appear to be Creative Commons licensed. Kaldari (talk) 18:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Darn. Sorry about that. I guess I didn't reapply the CC filter on a subsequent search. Thanks anyhow. Biosthmors (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Belize 1 cent coin.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 07:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tylozygus bifidus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptinotarsa juncta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Kaldari/inat2commons.js

Hi Kaldari, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Kaldari/inat2commons.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 7 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 36 character 31: Unclosed template literal. - Evidence: var summary = `
2. ISSUE: line 167 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
3. ISSUE: line 35 character 52: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: launchUpload: function( uploadParams ) {
4. ISSUE: line 17 character 24: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: inat2commons = {
5. ISSUE: line 167 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
6. ISSUE: line 15 character 114: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: mw.loader.using( ['mediawiki.user', 'mediawiki.api', 'mediawiki.ForeignApi', 'jquery.ui.dialog'], function() {
7. ISSUE: line 167 character 1: Expected ')' and instead saw ''. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
8. ISSUE: line 167 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
9. ISSUE: line 6 character 94: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: if ( mw.config.get( 'wgNamespaceNumber' ) === 14 && mw.config.get( 'wgAction' ) === 'view' ) {

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Kaldari/inat2commons.js

Hi Kaldari, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Kaldari/inat2commons.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 36 column 19: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantic horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 03:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marpissa pikei male 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phidippus putnami female 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coreopsis P8022391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thalurania colombica 25626623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Map of the world by the US Gov as of 2016 no legend.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and detailed view. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

iNaturalist tool

Hi Ryan; good to meet you at Wikimania and explore the Swedish woods with iNaturalist. I'd be very keen to try out your new tool and see how it works with New Zealand species. Let me know how it goes. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 12:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@Giantflightlessbirds: To install the tool, copy the following into User:Giantflightlessbirds/common.js... Kaldari (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

mw.loader.load( '//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kaldari/inat2commons.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' );

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eueides isabella eva 12075392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachylemur insignis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kaldari,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kaldari,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kaldari,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scooped Scarab (Onthophagus hecate).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just over the bar --Poco a poco 21:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zodiac wheels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenodera sinensis on a fence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 05:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your best shot 2019

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2019

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Metadata

Hi! I saw somewhere you fixed FAL template that had problems with missing meta data. Perhaps you can help me on lb.wiki?

I would like to empty lb:Kategorie:Fichieren ouni maschinneliesbar Lizenz and the other categories like it.

To do so I need to fix metadata per m: File metadata cleanup drive/How to fix metadata but I could use a little help.

I asked for help at m:Talk:File_metadata_cleanup_drive/How_to_fix_metadata#lb.wiki. If you know how and have a little time it would be nice if you could have a look.

Also I wonder if text like this "<div id="Schabloun_Bild-PD-al>" is needed on the license templates. You can see them all on lb:Kategorie:Schabloune fir Billerlizenzen but if someone help me fix a few I can do the rest. --MGA73 (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laughing Bird Caye panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sibovia aprica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tromba xanthura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)