User talk:JopkeB

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JopkeB!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear JopkeB,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anjos Cantores.jpg

Hi there, I noticed that you asked for deletion of this file directly at the file page. This is not how things work here, since freedom of panorama issues always need a full deletion discussion. So I created this page for you. De728631 (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC) ː OK, thanks. JopkeB (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Controle

Jopke, ik ben blij dat we elkaar begrijpen. Wanneer je bij de controle dingen vindt, is het misschien raadzaam dit te vermelden bij de beschrijving. Dat scheelt weer turen voor de volgende controleur. Het is ook mogelijk om foto's in een beschrijving te zetten. Bij historisch onderzoek van een pand is men blij met foto's van voor de renovatie. Groet, Lidewij (talk) 11:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC) PS je moedertaal is Nederlands?

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chinese room, Huis ten Bosch, The Hague.jpg

And also:

• File:Huis ten Bosch, Holland, ceiling ballroom.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, Holland, renovation ballroom, 2018-1.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, Holland, renovation ballroom-2.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, Holland, renovation ballroom-3.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, kitschen-1.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, renovation-7.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch, The Hague-11.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch10.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch12.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch3.jpg
• File:Huis ten Bosch5.jpg
• File:Huis-ten-bosch-rene-verleg-1.jpg
• File:Top back side of the Huis ten Bosch during renovation in 2017, The Hague.jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 10:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Broodjes en boter

Dag JobkeB, ik had de toevoeging van categorie "Butter in the Netherlands" verwijderd omdat het boter is die in België wordt gebruikt. Zie de omschrijving. Aan het kuipje is wel te zien dat de boter uit Nederland komt. Dan is het volgens mij eerder "Butter from the Netherlands". Als er bijvoorbeeld een flesje olijfolie had gestaan waarbij uit het etiket blijkt dat het gemaakt is in Griekenland of dat uit de foto van het bestek blijkt dat het uit Thailand komt, dan zouden categorieën als "Olive oil in Greece" en "Cutlery in Thailand" gebruikers op het verkeerde been kunnen zetten naar mijn mening. Voor mij is het verder geen belangrijk punt, dus ik laat het zo staan. Groeten, Wouter (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Beste @Wouterhagens:, dank voor uw toelichting. Ik had inderdaad over het hoofd gezien dat de foto in België was genomen. Excuses. Ik heb de categorie veranderd naar gewoon "Butter" zonder land.JopkeB (talk) 18:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Een goed idee! Wouter (talk) 19:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kaart haven Spijkenisse 2019.png

Copyright status: File:Kaart haven Spijkenisse 2019.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kaart haven Spijkenisse 2019.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Kaart haven Spijkenisse en omstreken 2019.png

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

• @Magog the Ogre:I mentioned the licence in both files: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright CC BY-SA 2.0. See translation in English on https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en. So what is the problem? What else should I do to keep the file? JopkeB (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:675px Het Valkhof Schlangenglas cropped.jpg

Copyright status: File:675px Het Valkhof Schlangenglas cropped.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:675px Het Valkhof Schlangenglas cropped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I have just added a correct tag. Could the proposal to deletion please be removed? JopkeB (talk) 05:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, a 'no license' tag can be removed as soon as a valid license is present. Jcb (talk) 07:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi JopkeB,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi JopkeB,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi JopkeB,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Transoms_(architectural_elements)_in_the_Netherlands

Transoms (architectural elements) in the Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/02/Category:Transoms_(architectural_elements)_in_the_Netherlands. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2020 (UTC)