User talk:Fæ

I am regularly travelling, often over long weekends, so may be slow to respond to questions. It helps if you remember to {{ping}} me on discussions that are not kept on this page. Sometimes I am available on IRC #wikimedia-commons, but my connection is flakey, so private messages easily get lost each time a connection drops. Feel free to email or become a contact on Telegram or Twitter where messages are persistent, for a more reliable off-wiki discussion. Keep in mind I lose track of emails too, even those I planned to reply to. Faebot is alive in different places, so some tasks running on Labs have proven stability and carry on regardless of whether human me is still around. However tasks running from my local desktop may pause when my home machine is off for safety reasons. A few tasks run on a headless Raspberry Pi, which should be more resilient as it can continue unattended. --Fæ (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC) When unattended my 8 year old laptop sometimes will crash in unexpected ways due to overheating. Faebot may miss a few things for these reasons, especially when I am travelling. --Fæ (talk) 11:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

If you want to see Python source code that supports some of my projects, go to Github and help yourself. The code is not written with reuse in mind... --Fæ (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

If you are concerned that a category gets flooded with automated uploads, check that a template like {{Disambig}}, {{Photographs}}, {{Categorise}}, {{CatDiffuse}} or {{CatCat}} has been applied before complaining. In the case of my batch upload projects, any category marked this way will not be added to new photographs. --Fæ (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

2017 2018 2019 2020

Silverton

Recatagorized all images in the Category:Silverton to Category:Silverton, New South Wales.

Thanks~Cessna_208_Caravan#/media/File:Cessna_208_Caravan_I,_Seawings_(Jet-Ops)_AN1347237.jpg

It is helping young students learn that the cockpit is not really that complicated ~ and all those fancy buttons and such do have a purpose and are very easy to learn ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchellhobbs (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Mt. Rainier from Roof Garden, Hotel Lincoln, Seattle, Wash (NYPL b12647398-68897).tiff

What (if anything) is the basis for 1898 as a date for File:Mt. Rainier from Roof Garden, Hotel Lincoln, Seattle, Wash (NYPL b12647398-68897).tiff? Looks based on a photograph, not just an architect's visualisation drawing, but the building had not been built at that date (completed 1900, burned in 1920). - Jmabel ! talk 06:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

The date is simply pulled from the NYPL catalog. In this case the date appears to be for the collection not the item. Hence "1898: Issued (Approximate)" is actually the earliest date for objects in the collection, so if we can deduce more based on the building itself, that can at least be added. The dates for the postcards should probably all be adjusted to a date range or at least qualified to say this is the earliest date.

As the upload was 2016, I have no precise memory of the mappings used, and the current NYPL catalog page looks very different to what it was back then and may be displaying different data. --Fæ (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

About what I thought. Sounds like if we can still identify what was in that batch, anything that says 1898 should instead say {{other date|after|1898}}. I'll correct the date for the one I was looking at. - Jmabel ! talk 07:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Probably 5,775 matches search. --Fæ (talk) 07:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

 Done dates replaced. --Fæ (talk) 09:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, I notice, in looking at half a dozen of these Detroit Publishing Co. postcards, that they have serial numbers. Maybe those numbers are in strict chronological order, in which case a category listing them in that order would allow interpolating from the dated ones to date all of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim.henderson (talk • contribs)

The categories already have keys by image ID. I hestitate to replace those keys. However I am running a routine to add postcard numbers from the NYPL catalog to the description, ref search. This makes it easier to do some smart report later, without having to read from external sites.

As a test, it may be that DPC>5000 ⇒ year>=1901 and DPC>6000 ⇒ year>=1902 --Fæ (talk) 17:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Ah, and I see you have started adding "Postcard series number" from the publisher's printed serial number. Very good. Clearly the files already have many numbers, but what I failed to notice is that they are already sorted chronologically, more or less, because that's how the "NYPLb" number was assigned. This suggest that all year I have been going about this the wrong way. Instead of continuing what someone else started, by making and filling geographic subcats, I should have started with annual subcats, partly to break down the large category that hinders my operation with slow DSL and other impediments, and partly as inboxes for geographic and other category work. It might help if the sources and uses of the various numbers were described on a page, perhaps the Detroit Publishing category talk page or some other that the ignorant are likely to stumble across. Jim.henderson (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Detroit postcard numbers

Elle of Ganado, DPC 9999, published "prior to 1906"

Looking at the first 2000 DPC numbers, filtering for dates (and end of range dates where they appear), gives:

Year	Min	Max
1901	132	497
1902	5011	7636
1903	6002	6999
1904	60523	8704
1906	9011	9999
1908	11000	12157
1909	12026	12999
1915	60007	60538
1918	71002	71981

Empirically that's probably very good evidence to use the postcard number to deduce a latest date of publication where this is missing, noting that some have ranges like 1905-1915, so choosing "1915" is definitely a latest date that might be refined later.

A place to keep specific dating tips for the NYPL collection is at User:Fæ/Project list/NYPL, it may even be worth a shortcut link. --Fæ (talk) 11:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Monkeys Spinning Monkeys (ISRC USUAN1400011).mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

FV Promotion

Play media

★ This video has been promoted to Featured video! ★ The video File:Healthy Pregnancy Tips From the CDC.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest videos on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured video candidates/File:Healthy Pregnancy Tips From the CDC.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 14:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Prośba

Bardzo proszę o napisanie do mnie po polsku, bo niestety, ale nie znam angielskiego i nie wiem w czym jest problem. Pozdrawiam:) Keres 40 (dyskusja) 16:01, 12 gru 2019 (CEST)

Thanks :)

It's just amazing! Thank you for uploading this! :) Regards, Salicyna (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

L. De Man - a Dutch Marine artist, and two incorrect uploads

Hi Fæ, Your upload of File:A Bear Hunt in the Arctic RMG BHC0974.tiff is incorrectly uploaded. The image should be flipped. The fault lay in the past with RMG / NMM I think. The correct image can be found here on Commons with the wrong name and details. See File:Royal Yachts, one Ketch Rigged and one Smack Rigged RMG BHC0979.tiff Again that too was uploaded incorrectly for probably the same reason. See the Museum site for confirmation.

Additionally you will notice that the latter file is incorrect, it should in fact be this image at the museum site [Royal Yachts, one Ketch Rigged and one Smack Rigged]. I don't know if it's lurking elsewhere on commons under another name. Obviously all the other details for both files are correct, just the wrong images are in place.

Question: Why do I have to bother you to make the corrections? The server is not letting me do it? Why? Regards. Broichmore (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

You may be seeing the artwork overwrite flag? This affects everyone and is, frankly, a pain in the arse. If you are seeing some other error, I'm not sure what it is. --Fæ (talk) 11:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes I saw it and pushed for ignore and carry on, to no avail. Broichmore (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Ignoring should work. You may want to make a separate upload, then raise it on AN for a sysop to do the overwrite. In my view, as the largest uploader of artwork files on this project, the artwork overwrite flag is badly implemented and trusted accounts should not suffer blacklisting uploads like this. --Fæ (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

There's an Admin who accused me (incorrectly) of vandalism, so much bs, has he put a block on me of some description? Broichmore (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

No, the log on your account is blank. --Fæ (talk) 11:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

I've fixed almost everything, in Category:L. De Man, except for the replacing the tiff, of [Royal Yachts, one Ketch Rigged and one Smack Rigged] which I don't have access to get, or am I doing something wrong. Do you have special privileges at NMM? Also now that this awful BREXIT business is finished, are you now going to resume visitations to the Penderel?

I have spoken in real life with parts of the NMM, but I do not have special access. To download the TIFF you have to use their IIP image server and dezoom them, for which you can probably use the process at User:Fæ/dezoomify for a one-off. The Ophir tool renders a PNG, but it's still an option.

As for 'spoons, I'll not be walking into any for the foreseeable future. --Fæ (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately that didn't work for me. So I'll have to wait for the 'spoons' and get lucky for someone who can explain. I'm still on NoScript.

However, might it be the case they have withdrawn access to tiff?

Have a look at File:The capture of HMS 'Tickler', 4 June 1808 RMG BHC0584.jpg which I just downloaded, and have a look at the folder Category:HMS Tickler (ship, 1804).

Earlier you had downloaded a black and white tiff from the same URL. They seem to, on occasion augment / revise data / upgrade images and sometimes flip them / etc.  Clearly there are also many new images and upgrades on the NMM site that we don't have. Do you scrape for such changes? Can you?

Another thing we don't catch on their pages is their cells "Object connections: example Vessels. Regards Broichmore (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

While I'm at it can I ask, why you upload tiff's as opposed to PNG's. I ask because I'm having to make a similar decision, and would value your advice on it. Thanks. Broichmore (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Speedy deletions for files over 10 years old

Hi! I think this category is a great idea. It makes it easy to spot old files that need someone to look at them. I made a few edits like this one just as a test. Do you agree we can remove the category once source / author has been added? --MGA73 (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes. If the file is still found in speedy categories it may be re-added. There is no automatic removal at the moment. --Fæ (talk) 10:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

@MGA73: The script will now (eventually) auto-remove the maintenance category if the image has been removed from the tracked speedy delete candidate subcategory. --Fæ (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

WTF is this aggressive category good for? I just reverted some vandalism by this havoc running bot, that marked some of my pictures for speedy deletion. WTF is this havoc running and scaremongering good for? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion means only one thing: This file should be deleted asap. The category sais just one thing: This file should be deleted asap, because it's too old. If you had anything else in mind with this category, it's completely wrong named. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Given User:Faebot/old speedies, what name would you suggest? --Fæ (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Anything without the clearly defined word speedy in it. Maintenance would be the first word that comes to my mind.

Nevertheless, I can't even come up with any reason why the two files by me have been tagged by this scaremongering havoc-run at all: File:Martin Luther Dampftraktor in 2002.jpg and File:Altteile des Martin Luther Dampftraktor in 2012.jpg are missing nothing. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

The picture, you use as an example on that page User:Faebot/old_speedies has as well everything necessary to keep it from being speedy deleted. What's this extreme scaremongering good for? Why did you use the complete misleading term speedy deletion for files, that are in no way in any risk of being deleted at all, let alone speedy? Who do you want to scare away? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

The thumbnail example is in a subcategory of Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Jcb's history of deletions shows that there are administrators that will and do delete files with "missing" sources, without actually reading the image page.

With regard to the example, I am unsure what triggered the file being found. Files must be in one of the subcategories of Candidates for speedy deletion. Here's the breakdown automatically generated and used by Faebot:

List out of date refer to User:Faebot/old_speedies for current list

Category:Other speedy deletions - Category:Drawings by Leo Gerstel in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam - Category:Speedy deletions for files over 10 years old - Category:Speedy deletions for files over 3 years old Category:Media missing permission - Category:Media missing permission as of 23 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 24 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 25 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 26 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 27 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 28 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 29 February 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 1 March 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 2 March 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 3 March 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 4 March 2020 - Category:Media missing permission as of 5 March 2020 - Category:No OTRS permission - Category:Media missing permission as of unknown date - Category:Media with PD-Denmark50 but no explanation why the photograph is public domain in the United States - exempt - Category:Possibly unfree Lemill Web Albums files Category:Media without a license - Category:Media without a license as of 23 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 24 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 25 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 26 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 27 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 28 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 29 February 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 1 March 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 2 March 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 3 March 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 4 March 2020 - Category:Media without a license as of 5 March 2020 - Category:Files with no machine-readable license - Category:Media uploaded without a license - Category:Media without a license - exempt - Category:Media without a license as of unknown date - Category:Media without a license: needs history check - Category:New uploads without a license - Category:Own work - Category:PD-Art (PD tag) Category:Media without a source - Category:Media without a source as of 23 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 24 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 25 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 26 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 27 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 28 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 29 February 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 1 March 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 2 March 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 3 March 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 4 March 2020 - Category:Media without a source as of 5 March 2020 - Category:Images without source - Category:Media without a source as of unknown date Category:Copyright violations - Category:Files from Bollywood Hungama with broken source links - Category:Flickr images from bad authors - Category:Non-free logos - Category:Pending fair use deletes - Category:Requested fair use deletes - Category:Copyright violations (OTRS) - Category:National Heritage Council of Namibia Category:Image crop missing parent page Category:Unfree Flickr files - Category:Possibly unfree Flickr images - Category:Recent unfree Flickr images Category:Personal files for speedy deletion

--Fæ (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

The source of the example picture is plain and clear on the file page, if some havoc running deletionist admin would delete it, s/he should be de-sysoped asap. My two pictures, the ones that I became aware of this havoc run, are in absolutely no such category, they were only briefly in it, because you placed the scaremongering cat on them. This is a maintenance category, not a deletionist category. The name is grossly misleading. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Backtracking is impossible, but the logic is that one of the above must be a parent category. If that has gone wrong, I am really unsure why but it might be related to the SDC category.

To avoid doubt, I'll change the code to post the relevant speedy deletion subcategory in the edit comment. It means rewriting the way the main loop works, so it may take a while.

Maybe a clearer name would be "Files uploaded over 10 years ago in a speedy deletion subcategory". --Fæ (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

If they were really in there, that could be OK, my two pictures were never ever in any trouble from the deletionists, not even those too lazy to read the page itself, not just the machine readable stuff. I can't say whether any other collateral damage was done with any other pictures like my two, and I won't look through every pic by hand. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 16:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

It's also true that the longer I have spent looking at these Speedy subcategories, the less sense they make. I have removed Category:Orphaned talk pages as a subcat, mainly because that actually includes Category:Commons orphaned talk pages that should not be speedily deleted‎ which could not be more obviously not a speedy deletion subcategory. As a result in the re-write I'll look at being very restrictive with which categories are scanned. --Fæ (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Duplicates among LOC maps

Hi Fæ, just wanted to bring to your attention that your current LOC map uploads seem to include duplicate files. Below is an incomplete list of examples, and I'm only listing the tif versions here, the same will probably apply to the jpg files. Thanks for looking into this. 2001:4BB8:25C:9E7:245A:38DD:DFBF:E60C 22:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-15.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-13.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-12.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-10.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-9.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-7.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Sonora, Tuolumne County, California. LOC sanborn00859 004-30.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Sonora, Tuolumne County, California. LOC sanborn00859 004-28.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Cherokee, Alfalfa County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07036 003-7.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Cherokee, Alfalfa County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07036 003-9.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-16.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Rochdale, Worcester County, Massachusetts. LOC sanborn03831 001-18.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-36.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-34.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-31.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-33.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-30.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-28.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-24.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-22.tif

• File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-16.tif

File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-18.tif

Examining the last two, the jpg versions show:

            "87685455": {
                "pageid": 87685455,
                "ns": 6,
                "title": "File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-16.jpg",
                "imagerepository": "local",
                "imageinfo": [
                    {
                        "timestamp": "2020-03-04T23:32:50Z",
                        "user": "F\u00e6",
                        "sha1": "cab001b26047e0ce0f1f977516ca8e85f9046158"
                    }
                ]
            },
            "87685555": {
                "pageid": 87685555,
                "ns": 6,
                "title": "File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Chickasha, Grady County, Oklahoma. LOC sanborn07038 005-18.jpg",
                "imagerepository": "local",
                "imageinfo": [
                    {
                        "timestamp": "2020-03-04T23:43:23Z",
                        "user": "F\u00e6",
                        "sha1": "676add21088fd6fff139906159d1e318be4d2ec5"
                    }
                ]
            }

For unknown reasons, the files have different SHA1 values, and so the mediawiki API will not return duplicate errors. There are more complex ways of finding these duplicates, but that would be a special project. It's also not clear why this apparent bug exists within the LOC API. --Fæ (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

File:【宜蘭景點】養蜂人家 (29792494923).jpg

File:【宜蘭景點】養蜂人家 (29792494923).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Solomon203 (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Copley Place, Boston, United States (Unsplash).jpg

File:Copley Place, Boston, United States (Unsplash).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Copley Place, Boston, United States (Unsplash).jpg Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

File:British Aerospace BAe-146-200QT Quiet Trader, TNT (Pan Air Lineas Aereas) AN0869790.jpg

File:British Aerospace BAe-146-200QT Quiet Trader, TNT (Pan Air Lineas Aereas) AN0869790.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Aerospace BAe-146-200QT Quiet Trader, TNT (Pan Air Lineas Aereas) AN0869790.jpg DS28 (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Non-core

You’ve probably noted it somewhere else on Commons but what does the "Non-core" column refer to in the DR tables e.g. in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fruit ninja game depiction with painted fruit on a naked female.jpg? Cheers. -Green Giant (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

It's a lazy filter for global "non-article" spaces. Currently the regex is "(talk|User|Commons|Wikipedia|Benutzer):". To be language-independent, I ought to rewrite it based on namespace numbers, but it's only a command-line report that is rarely run. --Fæ (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:(Left-right) Sgt. Robert Stone, a medic and native of Wayland, Mich., Capt. Reginald Trevino, the battalion surgeon and native of Denver, Cpl. Josh Archer, senior Alpha Company medic and native of Monroe, Mich 111126-A-BR342-293.jpg

---

Hello Fæ, it appears that the version of File:(Left-right) Sgt. Robert Stone, a medic and native of Wayland, Mich., Capt. Reginald Trevino, the battalion surgeon and native of Denver, Cpl. Josh Archer, senior Alpha Company medic and native of Monroe, Mich 111126-A-BR342-293.jpg which you uploaded 2014-04-05T21:38:36Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:(Left to right) Command Sgt. Maj. Jeffery Powell, outgoing Fort Sill Garrison command sergeant major; Col. Raymond Lacey, Fort Sill Garrison commander; and Command Sgt. Maj. Terry Hall, incoming Fort Sill 100831-A-UT312-017.jpg

---

Hello Fæ, it appears that the version of File:(Left to right) Command Sgt. Maj. Jeffery Powell, outgoing Fort Sill Garrison command sergeant major; Col. Raymond Lacey, Fort Sill Garrison commander; and Command Sgt. Maj. Terry Hall, incoming Fort Sill 100831-A-UT312-017.jpg which you uploaded 2013-08-26T16:37:09Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:(Left to right) Sadique Madathilatte, an AAFES employee at Camp Bucca, and a Kozhikode, Kerala, India, native, and Pfc. Hassan Walker, financial specialist for the 9th Financial Management Company, 3rd 101207-A-IX787-490.jpg

---

Hello Fæ, it appears that the version of File:(Left to right) Sadique Madathilatte, an AAFES employee at Camp Bucca, and a Kozhikode, Kerala, India, native, and Pfc. Hassan Walker, financial specialist for the 9th Financial Management Company, 3rd 101207-A-IX787-490.jpg which you uploaded 2014-07-26T09:11:17Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:(Left to right) Sgt. Estelsy Negron, dispersing manager, and a Los Angeles, Calif., native, and Pfc. Hassan Walker, financial specialist, and an Augusta, Ga., native, both with the 9th Financial Management 101207-A-IX787-415.jpg

---

Hello Fæ, it appears that the version of File:(Left to right) Sgt. Estelsy Negron, dispersing manager, and a Los Angeles, Calif., native, and Pfc. Hassan Walker, financial specialist, and an Augusta, Ga., native, both with the 9th Financial Management 101207-A-IX787-415.jpg which you uploaded 2014-07-26T09:11:53Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:(Left to right) U.S. Army Command Sgt. Maj. Jeffery Powell, outgoing Fort Sill Garrison Command Sgt. Maj., Col. Raymond Lacey, Fort Sill Garrison commander, and Command Sgt. Maj. Terry Hall, incoming Fort Sill 100831-A-UT312-014.jpg

---

Hello Fæ, it appears that the version of File:(Left to right) U.S. Army Command Sgt. Maj. Jeffery Powell, outgoing Fort Sill Garrison Command Sgt. Maj., Col. Raymond Lacey, Fort Sill Garrison commander, and Command Sgt. Maj. Terry Hall, incoming Fort Sill 100831-A-UT312-014.jpg which you uploaded 2013-08-26T16:31:05Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Compacting talk pages

IIRC you have a bot that can compact talk pages. Can you enable it on User talk:Chyah and User talk:Rafic.Mufid? (same user, both accounts blocked unfortunately) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done Added to Category:Talk page trimmer. --Fæ (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Dassault Falcon 50 AN0749595.jpg

File:Dassault Falcon 50 AN0749595.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dassault Falcon 50 AN0749595.jpg DS28 (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Clowing Around with Z (5975877447).jpg

Notice of Impending Speedy Deletion File:Clowing Around with Z (5975877447).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

clpo13_(talk) 19:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sononia County, California

Can you double-check Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sononia County, California? It's a subcategory of Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sonoma County, California which is the actual name of the county. I think the images are duplicates so they can be deleted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:War on germs during war with Germany. Wellcome L0006210.jpg

File:War on germs during war with Germany. Wellcome L0006210.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:War on germs during war with Germany. Wellcome L0006210.jpg Sammyday (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

File:【宜蘭景點】養蜂人家 (30386078846).jpg

File:【宜蘭景點】養蜂人家 (30386078846).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Solomon203 (talk) 06:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Uncrop needs

Hi Fae. This file File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14595391917).jpg (and some others) need to be uncrop. I made the request, unfortunately the result is not good because the View Book Page does not match the image. I tried again to request the uncrop after changing the page number, but the uncrop failed twice. I do not know why. Can you please help me solve this problem? The files are as follows:

• File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14595391917).jpg
• File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14779551314).jpg
• File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14779414564).jpg  Done
• File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14778665571).jpg
• File:Cyclopedia of architecture, carpentry, and building - a general reference work (1912) (14758849176).jpg

Thank you so much for your help. Best wishes. --DenghiùComm (discussione) 04:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

It is possible that the file is wrongly archived. The correct page number gives me 404 errors when trying to download the jpg. You may need to try manual downloads rather than relying on automation. --Fæ (discussione) 17:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Fae. I come again to you. I have correct in all thes files the Book Viewer that does'n match the image, and asked the uncrop, but only one file was fixed. Please can you help me why the other files were not uncrop ? Thank you so much for your help. Cheers,--DenghiùComm (talk) 09:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial

Affected:

• File:Stainless-steel trooper "on patrol" on grounds created to resemble Korea's rice paddies at the Korean War Veterans Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2011634953.tif

And also:

Extended content

File:Stainless-steel trooper "on patrol" on grounds created to resemble Korea's rice paddies at the Korean War Veterans Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2011636353.tif File:Stainless-steel troopers "on patrol" on grounds created to resemble Korea's rice paddies at the Korean War Veterans Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2011635716.tif File:Stainless-steel troopers "on patrol" on grounds created to resemble Korea's rice paddies at the Korean War Veterans Memorial, Washington, D.C LCCN2011636352.tif

Yours sincerely, – BMacZero (🗩) 17:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Jim and Carol Fidler (16760900563).jpg

File:Jim and Carol Fidler (16760900563).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jim and Carol Fidler (16760900563).jpg Pibwl (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:2010 CHINE (4588071947).jpg

File:2010 CHINE (4588071947).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:2010 CHINE (4588071947).jpg Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Crematorium poster.jpg

File:Crematorium poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)