User talk:Darwinek

Image:Plant 0030.jpg

This is a Weigela -- Pixeltoo 14:38, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Some plants

Image:Flower 208.jpg is Coreopsis verticillata and Image:Flower 228.jpg is Bracteantha bracteata --Franz Xaver 23:07, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi

Where are featured pictures over here?--Dakota ~ 17:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi back. Thank you. I can hardly find anything on commons but I do love to come and check out the images. I especially like Image:Czciesz win 545.jpg. I have never seen snow like or hardly any at all for that matter. It doesn't snow where I am from and they say only rarely where I am at the present time.--Dakota ~ 06:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks you. Will be watching for more images. Just now saw your nominated image on featured POTD and voted.--Dakota ~ 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• You are very welcome.--Dakota ~ 00:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• You are welcome. The weekend is being nice. Yes I have a photo, but only one or two. Do you have gmail?--Dakota ~ 09:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Nice new additions to your gallery.Dakota ~
• You are welcome, no problem.--Dakota ~ 00:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Not bugging you but it slipped my mind until today to tell you why I look at pages here every day in case you are too busy. Look at the history of my user page and you will know why. Thank you.--Dakota ~ 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Hello, está tan tan, hope you are well. Hope that you do well on your studies.--Dakota ~ 03:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Had not been over here in ages and found you had reverted blanking. Thanks. Actually came over to see if you had uploaded anything new and stole a pic for my userpage. Thanks :)--Dakota ~ 07:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• [1]&[2] Asteraceae---Red and white pom pom dahlia :)--Dakota ~ 21:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[3] Hydrangea :)--18:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome. [4] Leucanthemum, Ox-eye daisy. The others I will try to help with when I get a little more time :)--Dakota ~ 03:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

They are all identified. The yellow ones appear to be all the same. Check them over and if incorrect I am sorry-:)--Dakota ~ 18:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sliwka 944.jpg

It is lovely. Dakota ~ :) 04:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Flower 378.jpg

These are called Black-Eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta) (Asteraceae). It is a annual or shortlived perennial native to the eastern United States.

Ok, I guess its not a Black-Eyed Susan because it is only found in the United State, but it certinly looks like a en:Rudbeckia. --Digon3 ^talk 15:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Photographer's Barnstar for a fine photographer. --Sandahl 20:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Cieszyn

Dziękuję za dodanie informacji do mojego zdjęcia z Cieszyna. Przy okazji chciałbym też zapytać o 2 inne miejsca w Cieszynie. Nie orientujesz się może co to za kościoły: [5] [6] Z góry dziękuje za informacje, które umożliwią załadowanie zdjęć na Commons. Pozdrawiam! --Lestat 18:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Szkoda, ale może jeszcze kiedyś dojdę co to za miejsca ;-) pozdrawiam! --Lestat 10:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Popisek

Ahoj, díky za tu změnu i popisy v polštině. Myslel jsem břeh, jak je vidět na fotce. Ale máš pravdu, je to zavádějící, protože pohled na řeku je proti proudu.--Ondřej Žváček 17:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za ty doplněné popisky v polštině!--Ondřej Žváček 20:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky tentokrát za německé popisky! A veselé Vánoce!--Ondřej Žváček 19:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC) (Samozřejmě i za polské, teprve teď jsem si jich všimnul!--Ondřej Žváček 20:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC))

Ahoj v novém roce! Nejsem uživatel z české Wikipedie, jak jsi na to přišel?--Ondřej Žváček 08:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, moc díky, polský název změním tedy na Champasak. (Měl jsem na mysli spíš přepis, české exonymum samozřejmě také neexistuje. Anglický název je též přepis; původní název je navíc tonální.) Jasně, některé mé fotky se objevily na české Wikipedii, dal jsem souhlas s jejich uveřejněním (ještě než jsem je sám začal uveřejňovat tady na Commons). Vzniklo tak ohledně některých nežádoucí zdvojení, které se ale snad již podařilo odstranit. Účet na žádné z Wikipedií nemám, asi bych bohužel na práci wikipedisty neměl čas. Jen si tady vytvářím takovou svou galerii s tím, že obrázky budou sloužit všem. :) --Ondřej Žváček 07:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Odpowiedź

Witaj, fotka, o której piszesz została zrobiona za rogatkami Bystrzycy, ale raczej jeszcze na jej terenie (chociaż widać już Nydek), sporo od miejsca gdzie znajdowała się tablica "Witajcie w Nydku". Na pewno ta wykonana jest w Nydku: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Czantoria%2C_Nydek_2007.jpg a ta na pewno jeszcze w Bytrzycy: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Czantoria_2007_r..jpg Tutaj, na tej stronie pod hasłem Nydek jest fotka z tablicą, którą się sugerowałem - nie mogę wkleić linka, bo strony o tej domenie nie są dopuszczane z jakichś powodów (pewnie chodzi o reklamy): www.drewnianyslask.za.pl

Zase znaky

Marně pátrám po tak kvalitních vyobrazeních znaků, jaké jsi nahrál Ty. Na stránkách obcí jsou znaky většinou ubohé kvality :( Máš to z nějaké knížky, nebo netu? Kdybys mi mohl prosím napsat citaci té knížky, nebo ten odkaz na net. Díky moc. --Daniel Baránek 13:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

SVG country maps

I see from your gallery that you've uploaded vector images in the past, and I'll assume you're already familiar with the basics. To make the flag-map, I start with an SVG of the country outline, which can be obtained from a number of places. I then import this to inkscape, along with an SVG of the country flag. Then, I place the outline where it looks best, then I select the outline and then the flag (in that order). Once you have these selected, I go to Object->Clip->Set. This makes the first object clip the second. Then I group the whole thing, set the page size and save. Please let me know if you have any trouble. Jeff Dahl 19:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Where to get country outlines? It's not too hard if you know where to look. If you open Image:A large blank world map with oceans marked in blue.svg, all the country outlines should be there. Just take the one you want and delete the rest. There are other places to get the outlines, depending on what country it is, but the large blank world map should have enough detail to do pretty much any country. Jeff Dahl 01:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Popisky v turečtině

Bezva, to by bylo skvělé a velmi užitečné, popisku by možná s obtížemi, ale přeci jen rozuměli lidé nejen v Malé Asii, ale také ve velké části Ruska a Střední Asie (včetně čínského Turkestánu)! Fotky z Těšínska budu ještě nějaké nahrávat, kdyžtak dej vědět a vždy bych Tě na to upozornil (jestli chceš). Měj se fajně!--Ondřej Žváček 17:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Deska cti v Gorno-Altajsku

Ahoj! Deska cti je věnována místním zasloužilým občanům. Myslím, že jde o původně komunistický zvyk - matně si vzpomínám, že jako dítě jsem viděl pár takových desek i v jiných zemích "socialistického tábora", včetně ČSSR. Ale možná se mýlím.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Laos location+flag

You can open your flag file with wordpad (or source code with right button on image), then copy your code:

<rect fill="#ce1126" width="600" height="400"/>

<rect fill="#002868" y="100" width="600" height="200"/>

<circle fill="#fff" cx="300" cy="200" r="80"/>

Next step is to open location map code (using wordpad) and paste three lines of your flag image code before the map code last sentence </svg>

You will get:

<rect fill="#ce1126" width="600" height="400"/>

<rect fill="#002868" y="100" width="600" height="200"/>

<circle fill="#fff" cx="300" cy="200" r="80"/>

</svg>

You save the result and check image. Your flag is in the left top corner of the map.

To shift your flag to the right corner just add x coordinates:

<rect fill="#ce1126" x="1300" y="0" width="600" height="400"/>

<rect fill="#002868" x="1300" y="100" width="600" height="200"/>

<circle fill="#fff" cx="1600" cy="200" r="80"/>

</svg>

To shift down you can change y coordinates of your flag image.

To scale - you can use every possible way to change coordinates and rectangles/circle sizes.

Pozdrawiam i powodzenia w mapowaniu! Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Bogumin

Czy wiesz kiedy Bogumin otrzymał prawa miejskie, kiedy Bogumin Nowy, a kiedy zostały połączone w jedno miasto?? Na mapie województwa śląskiego z 1937 r. Bogumin jest zaznaczony jako wieś stąd moje pytanie. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (talk) 20:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Dzięki. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Licence

Ahoj, chtěl bych tě poprosit, jestli by jsi mohl tuhle fotku: File:Gruszka 3432.jpg, uvolnit pod licencí cc-by-sa 3.0? Rád bych ji použil do pexesa pro děti. S tou současnou gfdl licencí to ale nejde.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Dzekuje. Ci je ta Gruszka v Panstwoje Ceskym?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Marine

hi.

www.archives.gov saids

"Da Nang, Vietnam . . . A young Marine private waits on the beach during the Marine landing" By an unknown photographer, August 3, 1965 National Archives and Records Administration, Records of the U.S. Marine Corps (127-N-A185146) [VENDOR # 136]

but US Marines landed at Da Nang on March 8th, 1965 .

What do you thing about this problem ?

Takabeg (talk) 04:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Mormegil (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darwinek. You have new messages at Nihonjoe's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks

Thanks for the compliment. I feel proud. I’m trying my best in articles about Turkey and Telecommunications. Happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Award

Dzięki, zdjęć na pewno przybędzie, szczególnie przez lato. Pozdrawiam D T G (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Ten użytkownik spod IP 77.255.212.106 to zapewne znany z pl-wiki kolejowy 'wandalizator', nie wszystkie jego zmiany są złe, ale bardzo często wycofywane bo bez ładu i składu, częste wojny edycyjne itd. Edytuje spod zmiennego IP, a skoro teraz "udziela się" na commons, to będzie się trzeba wyczulić... D T G (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Map of Ecuador

Hi Darwinek, thank you for the picture:

Please, if you can draw the following coat:

(current version), also draw better boundaries, as in the following map:

Thanks, David C. S.

Ortaköy Mosque

Hi, your photo of Ortaköy Mosque which you nominated for VI is indeed very nice but I really think that there are other images that are more informative. So I open a Most valued review to compare them. Greetings.--MrPanyGoff 08:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ortaköy Mosque, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - Could you add a camera location please. Nice photo but it is difficult to choose one image in this category. Here (1, 2) other two good competitors. --MrPanyGoff 23:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I added the camera location. It is taken from the shore, while those two images from the boat. - Darwinek (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Tomer T (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

 Comment - Yes, it is beautiful but the main body of the mosque cannot be seen well.--MrPanyGoff 06:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. İstanbul 4228.jpg: +1
2. Mosque of Ortaköy.JPG: +0 
3. Istanbul - Mesquita d'Ortaköy.JPG: +0 
=>
File:İstanbul 4228.jpg: Promoted.
File:Mosque of Ortaköy.JPG: Declined.
File:Istanbul - Mesquita d'Ortaköy.JPG: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 08:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Trijnstel (talk) 18:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikiprojekt:Fotografia

Właśnie powstał Wikiprojekt:Fotografia. Jeśli interesujesz się robieniem zdjęć i chcesz wspierać swoimi fotografiami Wikipedię, zapraszam do współpracy. :) -- CLI (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Zaolzie mapa.jpg

File:Zaolzie mapa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gabbe (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

WLM 2012

Hello Darwinek, because you loaded slovakian photos too, I want you ask, if you have seen, the Slovakia participate Wiki loves monuments 2012 too since few days, perhaps you have some photos for this challenge too :-) It would be helpfull in our common neighbourhood ;-) --regards from Vienna K@rl (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church in Wisła, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Zaolzie mapa en desc.jpg

File:Zaolzie mapa en desc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Big Strahov Garden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It lacks the geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

• Coordinates were added. - Darwinek (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good now : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:08, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Flag map

I'd like to know if you could do some flag-maps for me. --BrunoMelo1995 (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darwinek. You have new messages at Steinsplitter's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Statue of Mimar Sinan in Edirne.jpg

The file was lost due to an server bug. Recovering is very expensive or even impossible. Please reupload this image if the source is still accessible to you. Yours sincerely McZusatz (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing. --McZusatz (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Darwinek/Italy

I renamed two of your images. Why do not you give your images a set of meaningful names? South Tyrol is great, there would be an exact file name useful. Thanks for all the beautiful photos and greetings--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Südtirol 9936.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Robert sonkin.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Robert sonkin.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:10, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bahla6.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bahla6.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bahla6.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Underlying lk (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Südtirol 1 0076.jpg

File:Südtirol 1 0076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0411.jpg

And also:

• File:Doha 0415.jpg

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0413.jpg

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

About photos

1. Dziękuję za medal:) Bardzo się cieszę:) Wielu jeszcze rzeczy niewiem, bo doświadczenie me jeszcze nie duże, więc mam pytanie a propo medalu: czy mam go dodać na swą stronę w Commons czy na Wikipedii, czy do obu? Czy może w ogóle nigdzie? 2. Widzę, po Twojej galerii, że poruszamy się po trochę podobnych rejonach:) Turcja i Bałkany to moje ulubione rejony i mam stamtąd kilkanaście tysięcy zdjęć i chciałbym je tu powrzucać a potem na Wikipedię. Ze Stambułu także, który jak widzę także Ty lubisz:) Ale to wszystko bardzo długo potrwa, bo zdjęć dużo, a one same ważą dużo MB. Na razie zajmuje się Śląskiem Cieszyńskim. Mam jeszcze tego trochę do wrzucenia:) Pozdrawiam Halavar (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0552.jpg

And also:

• File:Doha 0560.jpg

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Chaouia ouardigha.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chaouia ouardigha.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Chaouia ouardigha.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Darwinek⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Darwinek,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jan Olbrycht.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jan Olbrycht.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jan Olbrycht.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jarekt (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I would like to publish your photo of a divided city (Cesky-Tesin and Cieszyn in a forthcoming book. Would you grant permission for this, and if so, how should we acknowledge you as photographer? Is it OK to use as black-and-white? Stokelyj (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0467.jpg

And also:

• File:Doha 0472.jpg
• File:Doha 0479.jpg
• File:Doha 0563.jpg
• File:Doha 0565.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0414.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0398.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Doha 0477.jpg

And also:

• File:Doha 0489.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Beograd 7648.jpg

File:Beograd 7648.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tunisia ariana gov.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tunisia ariana gov.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Turkey black sea.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Turkey black sea.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Castillo blanco (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)