Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

New page reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:Vivek ji123

• Vivek ji123 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

[sigh...] I'm requesting this as I'm long-time trustworthy editor that doesn't want to lose the right to be able to see the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" link, as I occasionally "manually" patrol new pages in the course of my editing. Let me be clear – I have no intention of becoming a New Page Patrol "regular" (I do sometimes check the New Pages list, but not very often...), nor do I intend to use Page Curation. But we shouldn't be removing the ability to "spot-check" new articles from long-time regular editors, esp. those of us who occasionally come across new articles as part of our work for various WikiProjects (e.g. I sometimes come across new articles as part of WP:TV or WP:FILMBIO or even WP:TRAINS editing...). Anyway, I meet the qualification criteria, and I understand the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" link will soon be disappearing for the rest of us, so I'll go ahead and request this now. --Vivek ji123 09:46, 06 November 2020 (UTC)

Not done Sorry, your track record of article creation and lack of participation in deletion discussions do not suggest that you are sufficiently familiar with notability guidelines to receive the new page reviewer permission at this time.

As a side note, I'm afraid that I can't find a track record of you having marked any pages as patrolled, could you point me at an example of one? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Berrely

• Berrely (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

Hi there, I've participated in multiple WP:AFD discussions and show a clear understanding of guidelines. I would like to review new articles as I have noticed there are not nearly enough reviewers and I would like to help. Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • ^{Talk to me}∕_{What have I been doing} 20:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 480 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done for two weeks, try to do at least 10-20 reviews in that time. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission new page reviewer. — MusikBot ^talk 02:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Sam-2727

• Sam-2727 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

I've dabbled at AFD a bit in the past but I've been more active in recent months at WP:AFC, particularly at the help desk (although I've reviewed plenty of articles there as well). Sam-2727 (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Sam-2727 (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:40, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Mr.Mani Raj Paul

• Mr.Mani Raj Paul (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

Hello admin,

I gain much experience on Wikipedia about the new pages. In a short I want to say, I am now eagerly want (Give me a 1 or 2 days trial ) , I will do my best , thanks.... Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 11:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Not done. You've contributed many excellent articles, but for the most part these articles are about subjects with obvious inherent notability (e.g. any election article, "Critcket in Country X", Fauna of Afghanistan), and thus don't really demonstrate your knowledge of assessing notability. I am also particularly concerned about Chennai Super Kings–Kings XI Punjab rivalry, which doesn't cite any sources that actually say that these teams are rivals. Finally, your experience with deletion protocols seems a bit limited based on your AfD stats and your lack of a CSD or PROD log. I would suggest increasing your participation at AfD, fixing the issue with the Chennai–Punjab rivalry article, and reapplying in a few months. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

User:MrClog

• MrClog (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

I have previously been assigned this role for 6 months by Kudpung. I have started editing Wikipedia again and would like to help at NPP too. --MrClog (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC) MrClog (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Sri Harsha 191817

• Sri Harsha 191817 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

Respected admins, I'm interested in reviewing pages. Please promote me to New Page remover if you feel that I'm eligible. If you feel that I'm not eligible, please tell me reasons so that I can improve. Thanking you. Your's obediently. Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Not done, articles like Banasena and Ghoshayatra need citations to sources independent of the Mahabharata to demonstrate their notability. They also have some tonal and grammatical issues. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as well as our policies against original research and fix up articles that you have created before reapplying. Once you have a firm understanding of the relevant policies and guidelines may also want to consider participating in deletion-related processes, such as AfD, to build up a more compelling record of work next time you apply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Gpkp

• Gpkp (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

Hello. Had received temporary right which expired today. Requesting permanent flag. Please consider this as an unrequest if again eligible for temporary.
Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Gpkp, from looking at a sample of articles you approved, everything looks to be in order, but I can't find much of a record with deletion, and am hesitant to hand out the permission indefinitely in this situation. I would be happy to extend temporary rights for longer, but I'm afraid I don't understand what you meant in your last sentence. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill:, Thank you. What I meant was, as of now I was looking for the permanent right and not temporary, as I had the temporary right for last six months. I humbly withdraw my request. So once i meet the eligibility criteria with the deletion records, I would like to place the request again.
--Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Gpkp are you sure? It's really not a big deal to grant another extension. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you @Rosguill:, So kind of you. Actually whats the matter is, its really difficult to pass from temporary right to permanent/indefinite, as the performance range has to be more. I mean many hours has to be spent on checking articles of NPR list. So as days pass by, I thought of meeting the eligibility criteria with the deletion records and applying again. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm going to go ahead and renew your provisional permissions for another month. Your actual reviews have been great so far, it's just that I'd like to see a similar track record for the articles which you think don't meet notability guidelines. Also, I would suggest setting up WP:TWINKLE to automatically log any articles that you mark for CSD or PROD so that your deletion work is clearly recorded and easy to review.  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill: Thank you. Will take up your suggestion. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 09:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Sri Harsha 191817

• Sri Harsha 191817 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · curation log · deletion tag log · manual patrol log · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)^{(notify) (update mailing list)}

Respected admins, I'm interested in reviewing new pages . I want to encourage users in creating articles so that people can access wikipedia and gain knowledge. I promise you that I strictly prohibit vandalism and won't misuse my power. Please promote me to new page reviewer if you feel that I'm eligible. If I'm not eligible, please mention reasons so that I can improve myself. Thanking you. Your's obediently Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Not done, I literally just declined your request and gave you an explanation of what you can do to improve your editing. Don't WP:ADMINSHOP. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry sir. I won't repeat again.